Prada traded like a swing-focused wallet over the last 30 days, but the results were weak across both win rate and net profitability. This wallet made 118 trades across 12 unique tokens, with an average holding time of 599114 seconds, which fits a multi-day hold profile rather than fast intraday rotation. Activity was concentrated rather than broadly diversified, and the combination of limited token breadth with repeated trading in a few names suggests Prada tends to size conviction through repetition instead of spreading risk widely.
Recent performance was negative on nearly every key metric. Prada posted -4762.15 USD in PnL with ROI of -36.04%. Total buy volume came in at 13214.81 USD versus 8321.01 USD in total sells, showing that realized outcomes trailed deployed capital by a wide margin during the period. The wallet’s 16.67% win rate is especially important for copy traders, because it shows only a small share of trades finished green. With 118 total trades, this was not a low-activity sample, so the losses were built over sustained participation rather than one isolated mistake.
The largest drag was RARI at -2312.71 USD across 61 trades, making it the clearest source of downside and the most important sign of repeated unsuccessful re-entry or averaging behavior. Other notable losses came from 67cat at -944.01 USD, DIABLO at -430.32 USD, CINEMA at -363.24 USD, and 2Fad… at -322.93 USD. Additional negative contributions included 4WM1… at -263.70 USD, 6Pfo… at -115.69 USD, 7p6t… at -111.48 USD, DQP4… at -100.20 USD, and BBZ3… at -64.24 USD. The best result was modest by comparison: 2g4L… returned 187.48 USD, while H4KU… added 78.88 USD.
This wallet best fits a copy trader who is specifically looking for a higher-activity swing trader and is comfortable with low hit rate, concentrated token exposure, and recent drawdown. Prada does not currently profile as a consistency-first wallet. Someone copying this wallet would need tolerance for repeated attempts in the same token and acceptance that recent upside has not been large enough to offset the bigger losers.