Beaver traded like a swing trader over the last 30 days, with 24 trades across 11 tokens and an average holding time of 474519 seconds. Activity was fairly selective rather than hyperactive, but results show inconsistent execution. The wallet deployed 6319.42 in total buys and realized 3063.65 in total sells, suggesting open risk or positions that did not convert into strong exits during the period. A 25% win rate points to a profile that relies on occasional outsized winners rather than frequent small gains.
Performance for the window was negative overall. This wallet posted -832.08 in PnL with a -13.17% ROI, so recent trading has not been profitable on aggregate. The mix of outcomes appears uneven: a small number of positive trades were not enough to offset several larger drawdowns. Given the limited trade count, each position had a meaningful impact on the final result, which makes the wallet more sensitive to token selection and timing than a higher-frequency strategy would be.
The clearest positive contributor was PUNCH, which returned 856.02 across 4 trades and stood out as the best token in the set. BOATGUY also added 184.11 across 2 trades. On the downside, DJT was the biggest drag at -985.35 over 3 trades, making it the single largest loss and the main reason the period finished in the red. Other negative contributors included NETAINYAHU at -233.64, ALONSHOUSE at -208.55, NOTION at -186.95, Grande at -179.52, and DONE at -78.19. This pattern shows that winning calls did happen, but losses were broader and heavier.
This wallet may fit traders who are specifically looking to follow a swing-trading style with moderate activity and who are comfortable with uneven hit rates. Beaver looks more suitable for copiers who can tolerate drawdowns, token-level concentration in results, and a recent record where one strong win did not overcome multiple losses. It looks less suited for anyone seeking steady consistency, high win rates, or clearly defensive trade management based on the last 30 days.