Pain trades like a focused position trader rather than a high-frequency wallet. Over the last 30 days, this wallet made 30 trades across 7 unique tokens, which shows a relatively concentrated approach. The average holding time was 3123634 seconds, pointing to multi-day holds instead of quick flips. That longer holding period, combined with the focused token count, suggests Pain is willing to let positions develop rather than constantly rotating. The profile here is selective but not especially diversified, so results can be shaped heavily by a few names.
Recent performance was negative. In the last 30 days, Pain posted -415.64 in PnL with a -22.04% ROI. Total buys reached 1885.93, while total sells came in at 1086.74, reflecting a difficult stretch where exits did not recover deployed capital. The win rate was 28.57%, which is low for a wallet using a concentrated style. With only 7 tokens traded, each position had meaningful impact on the overall result. This combination of low win rate, negative ROI, and limited diversification makes the recent record look uneven and relatively volatile.
The clearest example of that concentration risk is the spread between the best and worst token outcomes. Pain’s best token was BUNKEE at 410.69, while the worst was CYBERLEEK at -547.02. Those two names alone explain much of the wallet’s character over this period: one strong winner, one larger loser. Looking at trade counts, CYBERLEEK had 7 trades and BUNKEE also had 7, so Pain showed repeated engagement with both. Other token results were smaller in magnitude, including 89.00 on GhJE…, -141.62 on 2auy…, -79.26 on bykr…, -77.14 on ASo3…, and -70.29 on HF8K….
This wallet would mainly fit someone looking to follow a concentrated, conviction-based trader who can hold positions for longer stretches. It is less suited to someone seeking steady hit rates or broad token coverage, since Pain’s recent 28.57% win rate and -22.04% ROI show that drawdowns can be meaningful. A copier would need to be comfortable with a style where a few positions can drive most of the outcome, both positively and negatively.