Spike traded like a focused day-trader over the last 30 days, with 30 total trades across 7 unique tokens. The average holding time was 4,672 seconds, which points to short-duration positioning rather than long swing holds. Activity was relatively concentrated, with repeated trading in a small set of names instead of broad token exploration. Total buy volume came to $2,198.41 against $2,140.32 in total sells, showing a compact, active style that looks built around frequent entry and exit decisions rather than passive holding.
Performance was slightly negative overall. This wallet posted -$58.10 in PnL with a -2.64% ROI during the period, despite a 57.14% win rate. That combination suggests Spike won on more than half of trades but gave back enough on weaker positions to finish below break-even. The numbers also show a trader whose edge, if any, depends on controlling downside, because the hit rate alone was not enough to offset losses. With only 7 tokens traded, results were also meaningfully influenced by a few individual positions rather than being spread across a large portfolio.
The clearest positive came from 9geq…, the best token by PnL at $190.51. Other solid contributors were ZiTP… at $185.07, FpjT… at $163.38 across 7 trades, and 4v5M… at $146.27. On the downside, the biggest drag was 7hJX… at -$336.67 across 6 trades, followed by Fune… at -$255.80 and Hm2y… at -$150.86. This split makes Spike look capable of finding profitable setups, but also vulnerable to a few positions erasing several good trades. The largest losing token was materially bigger than the largest winner, which helps explain the negative net result.
This wallet may appeal most to traders who want to mirror a short-term, concentrated style with clear turnover and a manageable number of active tokens. Spike is not a broad-market allocator and does not look like a long-hold wallet from these results. A copy trader looking for frequent action in a focused basket may find the style understandable, but should expect uneven outcomes when losses in a few names outweigh multiple smaller wins.