EFee…ViSA trades like a high-volume position trader rather than a pure scalper. Over the last 30 days, this wallet made 941 trades across 40 unique tokens, with an average holding time of 1056960 seconds. That mix suggests broad token rotation with positions held long enough to capture larger moves, while still maintaining frequent execution. The profile is active and diversified, but the low 22.5% win rate shows results rely on a smaller set of stronger winners rather than consistent hit rate across most trades.
In the last 30 days, this wallet posted -6711.2 dollars in PnL with -2.58% ROI. Total buys reached 260210.76 dollars, while total sells came in at 179724.72 dollars, showing meaningful capital deployment despite the negative net outcome. The combination of 941 trades and a 22.5% win rate points to a strategy that accepts many losing attempts in exchange for occasional larger payoffs. For anyone evaluating behavior rather than headline return, the main takeaway is turnover: this wallet stays very active, spreads exposure across many names, and appears comfortable absorbing drawdowns while waiting for outsized winners.
The clearest positive contributor was JEANPHIL, which generated 15692.9 dollars of PnL across 298 trades. That single token stands out as the major offset to a long list of losses. The worst result came from BOT at -3946.15 dollars over 48 trades. Other notable drags included JASON COIN at -3570.316014 across 8 trades, TIPPED at -3377.147749999999 across 65 trades, DOMAIN at -2773.576732 across 22 trades, and Canary at -1439.584486977947 across 11 trades. Smaller negatives also came from Tilcayo, fone, GREG, X7, and o, while SOLCAT added 1227.324023 dollars.
This wallet may appeal more to copiers who are specifically looking for a high-activity, basket-style trader that can lean heavily on a few standout winners. It is less suitable for someone seeking steady win rate or clean consistency, since most positions did not work and overall 30-day returns were negative. The fit is strongest for traders comfortable with frequent entries, broad token coverage, and uneven results driven by concentrated upside in select names.