Ca5R…LNKB traded like a focused position trader over the last 30 days, with activity concentrated across 5 tokens and 13 total trades. The average holding time was 2238183 seconds, which points to a slower, hold-based approach rather than rapid intraday flipping. Flow was relatively selective, with $10297.22 in total buys and $10196.08 in total sells, suggesting this wallet rotates a limited number of positions instead of spreading risk across many names. The 40% win rate shows it did not need constant trade accuracy to stay near flat, which can matter for copiers looking at discipline more than raw hit rate.
Performance for the period was slightly negative overall. This wallet posted -$32.22 in PnL with a -0.31% ROI, so results were essentially break-even after moderate capital turnover. That flat outcome came despite only 13 trades, which implies each position had a noticeable impact on the monthly result. The combination of a 40% win rate and near-flat PnL suggests the wallet’s average winners were meaningful enough to offset much of the damage from losing trades, but not enough to push the month clearly positive. In practical terms, this was a low-frequency wallet with mixed execution rather than a momentum account producing consistent gains.
The clearest positive contribution came from swordcat, which generated $851.22 across 2 trades. Another strong contributor was 5zNm…, up $578.90 over 2 trades. On the losing side, the biggest drag was 8jay…, down -$553.79 across 4 trades, making it both the worst token by PnL and the most traded name in the set. Other notable losses came from 9HB7… at -$491.53 over 2 trades and FPPG… at -$417.01 over 3 trades. These figures show that a small number of positions drove nearly all of the wallet’s monthly outcome.
This wallet may fit traders who want to follow a concentrated, slower-moving style with limited token count and moderate conviction per position. It is more relevant for copiers comfortable with waiting through longer holds than for those seeking high-frequency entries and exits. Because recent results were nearly flat and the win rate was 40%, this wallet looks more suitable for observers who value selective exposure and can tolerate uneven token-level outcomes.