Ansem traded like a position trader over the last 30 days, with activity spread across 66 trades and 18 unique tokens. The average holding time was 2179776 seconds, which points to a slower style than fast rotation wallets and suggests a willingness to sit through swings rather than scalp short moves. This wallet generated $25124.06 in realized PnL on $289792.33 of total buys and $314901.59 of total sells, for an ROI of 8.67%. The setup here looks selective on conviction sizing, but the results also show concentration risk because a small number of names had an outsized impact on the final outcome.
The recent performance profile is unusual at first glance because the win rate was only 27.78%, yet the wallet still finished solidly positive. That usually means losses were contained well enough and the winners were meaningfully larger than the losers. In this case, the spread between total sell volume and total buy volume supports that picture. Rather than needing to be right often, Ansem appears to rely on a few strong payoffs to carry a broader set of weaker trades. For copy traders, that matters: this is not a wallet that depends on frequent small wins, so performance may feel uneven and patience is likely required.
The clearest standout was BcHE…, which delivered $51558.16 across 7 trades and was the biggest single contributor by a wide margin. Other meaningful positives included 68Nq… at $16046.69 over 8 trades and 6Nwa… at $6647.92 over 2 trades. On the loss side, Emcx… was the biggest drag at -$18665.28 across 5 trades, followed by BPxx… at -$9529.44 over 6 trades. Additional negative contributors included 8PzF… at -$4887.66, AvxF… at -$4047.06, and 2YF1… at -$3187.30. That mix reinforces the idea of a lopsided return profile driven by a few large wins.
This wallet is best suited to traders who want exposure to a higher-variance, position-based style and who are comfortable with a low hit rate if the payoff profile stays favorable. Ansem may fit someone looking to follow a trader who can stay net positive despite many losing trades. It is less suitable for traders who prefer consistent win frequency, tight trade cadence, or broad diversification across many small positions.