Ansem’s last 30 days read like a position-trader profile with moderate breadth and relatively patient holding periods. This wallet traded 112 times across 20 unique tokens, with an average holding time of 3,453,966 seconds, which fits a style that is not purely intraday. The activity level is active enough to show conviction across multiple names, but the concentration in a limited token set suggests selective rotation rather than broad spraying. A 20% win rate shows this wallet has recently relied on a small number of outsized winners to offset a larger number of losing trades, which is an important trait for anyone evaluating whether the style matches their own risk tolerance.
Performance over the last 30 days was negative. Ansem posted -$46,409.27 in PnL on -17.59% ROI, with $263,857.32 in total buys versus $165,321.29 in total sells. Those figures point to a difficult month where realized outcomes did not keep up with capital deployed. The gap between buy and sell volume may also reflect positions that were reduced at a loss or are still working through longer holding periods, but the reported result is clear: recent execution has not translated into profitable aggregate returns. With 112 trades, this is not a tiny sample, so the drawdown is meaningful rather than a one-off from minimal activity.
The strongest result came from HcRL…, which generated $33,283.03 across 7 trades. That gain stands out sharply against the broader token list and shows this wallet can still capture a large winner. The weakest result was BKXt… at -$18,734.31 across 6 trades. Other notable drags included Ga5E… at -$11,446.33, 7LA4… at -$11,081.78, HmJD… at -$10,534.53, ELYf… at -$9,439.40, and DUZN… at -$7,264.13. ANM3… was also active with 24 trades and a loss of -$5,224.87, suggesting repeated attempts without strong payoff.
This wallet is better suited to copiers who specifically want exposure to a known high-variance position-trading style and are comfortable with low hit rates, uneven token selection, and periods of substantial drawdown. It is less suited to traders looking for steady consistency, high win rates, or tightly controlled downside over short windows.