Trench Guerilla traded with clear day-trader behavior over the last 30 days: 664 trades across 90 unique tokens, with labels that fit a high-volume, diversified approach. The average holding time was 62,647 seconds, which points to fast rotation rather than long-term conviction. This wallet spread activity widely instead of concentrating on a few names, suggesting a strategy built around repeated entries and exits across many setups. A 51.11% win rate shows that profitability did not rely on being right on every trade, but on keeping the overall book positive across a large sample.
In the last 30 days, this wallet posted $19,656 in PnL on 31.17% ROI. Total buys came to $63,061.38 and total sells reached $80,901.06, showing a meaningful realized gain relative to deployed capital. The combination of 664 trades and a 51.11% win rate suggests consistent throughput, where small and mid-sized outcomes likely accumulated into the final result. Because activity was spread over 90 tokens, performance appears to come from repeated execution rather than one isolated outlier, even though a few names contributed a notable share of profits.
The strongest contributor was TIGRINO at $6,310.57 across 32 trades, followed by Aiden at $3,994.37 from 9 trades and COCKROACH at $3,242.57 from 102 trades. Other profitable names included Agency at $2,382.65, BABYPHIL at $1,894.44, EA4J… at $1,581.90, 4GKf… at $1,434.83, D8GW… at $1,402.21, Bize… at $1,029.76, and AJ1g… at $1,003.10. On the downside, the worst token was 6vWk… at -$1,320.33 across 16 trades, followed by 6bQ4… at -$1,219.63 across 9 trades. That profile supports the view of active risk-taking with losses contained relative to total gains.
This wallet would most closely fit copy-traders looking for an active, short-horizon operator who trades frequently and rotates through many tokens. Trench Guerilla may appeal more to users comfortable with high trade count, broad token exposure, and a system where edge comes from aggregate execution rather than a few concentrated bets. It is less suited to someone looking for low-frequency positioning or a narrow portfolio.