fomo 🧠trades with a high-volume, diversified swing-trading profile across a wide set of names. In the last 30 days, this wallet placed 698 trades across 101 unique tokens, showing broad coverage rather than concentration in only a few positions. The average holding time was 341251 seconds, which fits a swing-style approach more than pure fast scalping. The combination of high activity and diversification suggests a trader rotating capital frequently while still letting some positions develop over multiple days.
Recent results were positive but uneven. Over the last 30 days, fomo 🧠posted $17707.6 in PnL with a 7.5% ROI. Total buy volume reached $236257.83 and total sell volume came in at $226215.37. The win rate was 28.71%, which is relatively low compared with the overall positive PnL, implying that gains from stronger winners outweighed a larger number of losing or smaller trades. That matters for copy traders because this wallet appears to rely more on payoff asymmetry than on consistent hit rate.
The standout gain was DAem… at $10422.33 across 22 trades. Other strong contributors included Hhcf… at $9455.717359657981 from 4 trades, HcRL… at $7232.042446810025 from 19 trades, 9h5A… at $6956.322461123291 from 18 trades, and 5wW9… at $4896.210596933659 from 7 trades. Additional profits came from 7MYp…, HgoS…, 2bDQ…, and DEW9…. On the losing side, the biggest drawdown was Hgcx… at -$3426.98 across 36 trades, followed by 6Xhz… at -$3166.327620039804 and BZFY… at -$2883.146545470549. The repeated trading in Hgcx… is notable because it combined high trade count with the worst token-level result.
This wallet may fit traders who are comfortable following an active, broad, swing-oriented style with many entries and exits and a lower win rate. fomo 🧠looks more suitable for people who can tolerate variability in outcomes and want exposure to a trader whose overall results depend on a handful of outsized winners more than steady single-trade accuracy.