fomo 🧠 looks like a highly focused position trader rather than a high-frequency Solana wallet. Over the last 30 days, this wallet traded only 5 times across 1 token, with all activity concentrated in 39vc…. The average holding time was 20,338,958 seconds, which points to a long hold relative to typical fast-rotating meme coin wallets. Based on the available data, the style here is concentrated, low-frequency, and dependent on a single idea rather than broad diversification.
Recent performance was weak. This wallet posted -$800.25 in PnL with ROI of -78.82% over the period. Total buys came to $1,015.35, while total sells were just $89.42, showing that most capital committed during the window was not recovered through exits. The wallet’s win rate was 0% across 5 trades, so none of the tracked trades closed profitably. With only 1 unique token traded, the recent result reflects one concentrated losing position rather than a mixed portfolio with offsetting gains.
The most notable point is that both the best and worst token were the same asset, 39vc…, with -$800.25 in PnL. That means the entire 30-day outcome came from a single token exposure. There were no profitable token positions in the dataset, and no evidence of successful rotation into other names to reduce damage. For traders reviewing consistency, this is a narrow sample, but it still shows clear downside from concentration risk and poor realized results during the period measured.
This wallet would mainly appeal to someone specifically looking to mirror a concentrated position-trading approach with very limited token selection. It is less suited to traders who want broad market coverage, active risk spreading, or evidence of recent profitable execution. Because fomo 🧠 traded just 1 token and logged a 0% win rate with deeply negative ROI in the last 30 days, the profile fits observers who understand single-position volatility and are comfortable with a wallet whose recent record was sharply underwater.