Crypto Pirate traded like a swing trader over the last 30 days, with 92 trades across 22 tokens and an average holding time of 453737 seconds. Activity was spread across a fairly broad token set rather than concentrated in a few names. The wallet put $11807.8 into buys and recorded $4449.24 in sells, which suggests ongoing position rotation rather than a fully closed book. With a 38.89% win rate and a small positive result overall, this wallet appears to rely more on position sizing and selective upside capture than on frequent high-probability wins.
Recent performance was modest but positive. Crypto Pirate generated $20.69 in profit with a 0.18% ROI over the period. That is a thin edge relative to the capital deployed, so the profile is more about active exposure management than standout return efficiency in this window. The low win rate means many trades did not finish green, but the wallet still stayed above water. This combination usually points to a style where a few stronger outcomes offset a larger number of smaller losses or flat trades.
The clearest positive contributor was RIVERBOAT, which produced $360.25 across 7 trades and stood out as the best token in the period. Other profitable names included POLYLEND at $67.3 from 2 trades and MPPFI at $39.35 from 2 trades. On the losing side, KRPTN was the largest drag at -$182.77 across 4 trades. Additional losses came from SANA at -$99.74 over 6 trades, OD at -$73.69 over 4 trades, pincode at -$50.06 over 6 trades, and DIVERG at -$45.33 over 7 trades. This mix shows that gains were real but not broad-based, with several tokens pulling results down.
This wallet may fit traders who want exposure to an active, multi-token swing approach and who are comfortable following a profile with uneven hit rate and modest net profitability. Crypto Pirate looks more suitable for someone studying trade selection and token rotation than for someone seeking a highly consistent short-term winner. A copier would need patience with drawdowns and acceptance that this wallet’s recent edge was narrow rather than dominant.
