This wallet traded like a position trader over the last 30 days, with activity spread across 52 trades in 13 unique tokens. The average holding time was 792640 seconds, which points to a slower approach than pure intraday rotation. Results suggest selective sizing and a willingness to revisit names rather than constantly expanding into new tokens. A 61.54% win rate combined with a 45.33% ROI shows this wallet did not need to win on every trade to stay profitable, and the token count indicates moderate diversification rather than a highly concentrated one-asset style.
In recent performance, this wallet produced $1449.86 in total PnL on $3198.54 of total buys and $4442 of total sells. That spread between buy and sell flow aligns with realized gains rather than just open exposure. Trade frequency was active but not excessive, and the mix of 13 tokens across 52 trades suggests repeated execution in a smaller basket. The overall profile is efficient: a positive ROI, a win rate above 60%, and enough turnover to judge consistency over a meaningful sample instead of a handful of isolated wins.
The strongest contributor was CARDS, generating $760.24 across 18 trades, making it both the top profit source and the most actively traded token in the set. STONKRBOT added $450.27 over 6 trades, while FULTON contributed $183.65 over 4 trades. Other profitable names included FxPv… at $147.10 and 6FGy… at $118.65. On the downside, the worst token was 6nZe… with a loss of $115.17 across 2 trades. Additional drags came from 6wAC… at -$90.31, AQ8H… at -$67.15, 8eVK… at -$64.91, and 4TAF… at -$63.00. The loss distribution looks contained relative to the top winners, which is a constructive trait.
This wallet may fit traders looking to copy a measured swing or position-oriented style rather than rapid-fire scalping. It looks more suitable for users who prefer repeat trading in a focused token list, can tolerate uneven outcomes across smaller positions, and want exposure to a wallet whose gains were driven by a few clear winners while keeping losses comparatively limited.