WaiterG appears to run a high-volume position-trading style over the last 30 days, combining frequent activity with holding periods that are longer than pure scalp trading. This wallet logged 262 trades across 20 unique tokens, with an average holding time of 2,099,794 seconds. That points to a trader who rotates through a moderate number of names rather than spraying into everything, while still staying active enough to manage positions closely. The 60% win rate suggests the approach does not rely on being right every time, but instead on letting stronger positions carry overall results.
Recent performance was strong by the numbers provided. WaiterG posted $49,461.44 in PnL with a 66.7% ROI over the last 30 days. Total buy volume came in at $74,155.82, while total sell volume reached $72,902.32. The wallet’s gains were built from repeated trading rather than a tiny sample size, which matters when evaluating consistency. Activity was concentrated but not overly narrow, since 20 tokens were traded during the period. The profile here is not low-frequency conviction only, and not hyper-fragmented meme churn either; it sits in the middle as an active position trader with meaningful throughput.
The standout winner was TripleT, which contributed $31,228.1 across 41 trades. Other major contributors included 9gBz… at $11,110.07 over 31 trades and CGED… at $5,243.85 over 80 trades. Additional gains came from HHBe… at $4,517.4, y4Ji… at $2,612, 9YvJ… at $2,265.51, EYZa… at $1,979.36, and 2N9B… at $1,792.01. On the loss side, the largest drawdown came from 3ToK… at -$4,556.07 over 25 trades. Other notable losses included J1Up… at -$2,704.63, hpvo… at -$2,534.04, and 2ssM… at -$1,796.89. The mix shows that a few large winners did a lot of the heavy lifting.
This wallet may fit traders who want to follow an active Solana operator with solid recent PnL, a decent win rate, and evidence of both scaling winners and absorbing losses. WaiterG looks more suitable for copiers comfortable with frequent transactions, multi-position exposure, and some concentration in top-performing names. It is likely less suitable for traders looking for ultra-low activity, very broad diversification, or a style that avoids uneven token-level outcomes.