Inside Calls traded like a position-focused Solana wallet over the last 30 days, with activity spread across 191 trades and 25 unique tokens. The average holding time was 1,847,807 seconds, which supports a slower style than pure intraday rotation. This wallet was profitable overall, but the edge looks moderate rather than dominant: 2.54% ROI on $71,845.94 in total buys, with realized sells of $73,550.29. A 40% win rate suggests results were driven more by a handful of stronger gains than by frequent small wins.
Recent performance shows a net profit of $1,822.04 across the period. The wallet kept volume fairly active while maintaining only a modest return on capital deployed, which can indicate selective conviction but uneven follow-through across entries. With 25 tokens traded, the approach was diversified enough to avoid relying on a single asset, yet concentrated enough for individual token outcomes to matter. The combination of 191 trades and a long average hold means Inside Calls appears to scale in and out rather than simply buying once and exiting once.
The clearest upside contributor was AdsL…, which generated $4,174.12 over 8 trades and stands as the best token in the dataset. Other strong contributors included 71vD… at $2,556.19 over 9 trades, AmSY… at $1,929.79 over 13 trades, 6xkW… at $1,390.43 over 6 trades, 2EqX… at $1,024.25 over 2 trades, and Bt56… at $1,011.89 over 6 trades. On the downside, the biggest drag was 2arj… at -$1,802.74 across 27 trades, followed by DBTN… at -$1,688.31 over 5 trades and EkJu… at -$1,420.36 over 12 trades. EuXm… also detracted -$957.10 over 5 trades. These figures show that repeat exposure to weaker names can weigh heavily on the final result.
This wallet may fit copy traders who prefer a position-trader profile with broad token coverage, steady activity, and tolerance for uneven hit rates. Inside Calls looks more suitable for users comfortable with moderate ROI, longer holding periods, and the possibility that a few standout winners need to offset several meaningful losers. It is less suited to anyone looking for a very high win rate or a tightly concentrated style.