Inquixit is an active Solana trader with a clear high-volume, diversified memecoin and swing-trading profile. Over the last 30 days, this wallet made 1,444 trades across 222 unique tokens, which points to broad scanning rather than concentrated conviction. The average holding time was 255,142 seconds, so positions were not pure scalps but also not long-duration holds. The combination of high turnover, wide token coverage, and a 36.49% win rate suggests a style that accepts many small misses while relying on rotation speed and selective outsized winners to drive overall results.
Recent performance was solid on the numbers provided. Inquixit posted $15,154.29 in profit with a 22.52% ROI during the last 30 days. Total buys reached $67,280.44 and total sells reached $80,761.36, showing realized gains despite the relatively modest hit rate. That is an important feature of this wallet: profitability did not come from winning on most trades, but from extracting more value from winners than was lost on losers. The activity level also matters for copiers, because 1,444 trades in a month implies a fast-moving workflow that can be difficult to mirror exactly without similar execution speed and attention.
The strongest named contributor was wif2, which generated $3,830.40 across 24 trades. Other notable winners included SQUEEZE at $3,295.39 over 24 trades, 76ha… at $1,401.60 over 11 trades, 5yyF… at $1,363.25 over 29 trades, and DJwF… at $899.42 over 27 trades. Additional positive contributors were 2yk6… at $807.63, AytN… at $774.32, 7Vtm… at $759.76, CGED… at $746.62, GWFB… at $612.03, and Ftwg… at $599.98. The worst named token was E7BB…, which lost $610.47 across 7 trades. That spread reinforces the pattern of multiple medium and large winners offsetting smaller setbacks.
This wallet is best suited to traders who want exposure to an aggressive, diversified Solana flow rather than a low-frequency conviction strategy. Someone copying Inquixit should be comfortable with many trades, a sub-40% win rate, and a process where overall profitability depends on trade management and capturing the better runs. It is likely a better fit for active traders who can monitor positions consistently than for passive copiers seeking a simple set-and-forget wallet.