Sugus is a high-volume, position-oriented Solana wallet with 219 trades across 17 unique tokens in the last 30 days. The average holding time is 8,424,104 seconds, which points to a trader willing to sit in positions rather than rotate instantly. Even with a 47.06% win rate, this wallet still produced strong net results, suggesting sizing and payoff distribution mattered more than raw hit rate. Trading activity was concentrated, with one token clearly dominating both PnL and trade count, which makes this wallet look less like a broad basket trader and more like a focused operator leaning hard into a small number of convictions.
Over the period, Sugus posted $346,526.50 in realized PnL and a 64.02% ROI. Total buy volume came in at $541,264.25 against total sell volume of $865,968.62, showing a large profitable turnover in exits. The wallet’s 219 trades indicate active management, but the holding profile still fits a position-trader label more than a pure scalper. The combination of high volume, moderate win rate, and high ROI suggests returns were driven by a few outsized positive outcomes rather than steady small gains on every trade. That matters for copiers because the wallet’s profile depends on catching the same major moves, not just mirroring frequent entries.
The standout result was EURC, which generated $346,120.31 across 140 trades and accounts for nearly all of the total PnL. Outside that, gains were much smaller: Prew… added $953.86 in 1 trade, GiE8… made $451.23 in 4 trades, 3sEv… made $339.95 in 10 trades, and GDbr… made $285.74 in 4 trades. Losses were relatively contained, with the worst being 64iU… at -$524.35 in 1 trade, followed by 2giC… at -$462.48 in 3 trades, E644… at -$240.85 in 7 trades, 2izf… at -$185.30 in 13 trades, and Hkp2… at -$157.49 in 5 trades.
This wallet best fits copiers who want exposure to a concentrated, high-volume trader whose results can hinge on one dominant token theme. Sugus may appeal to traders comfortable with a sub-50% win rate if the payoff from winners remains much larger than the drag from losers. It is less suitable for anyone looking for diversified token selection or evenly distributed sources of profit across many names.