Orangie Crypto: Wallet Address, PnL & Win Rate (2026)

Orangie crypto searches almost always end at the same three questions: what is the wallet address, are the profits real, and can a normal account copy them. The tracked Solana wallet is DuQabFqdC9eeBULVa7TTdZYxe8vK8ct5DZr4Xcf7docy, and over the 30 days ending September 18, 2026 our on-chain tracking shows it at $6,824 in realized PnL, a 59.4% win rate across 294 trades, and +12.4% ROI on roughly $55,000 of buy volume.

That last number is the interesting one. Every other trader profile on this site is a six-figure month — this wallet is not, and that is exactly why it is worth reading. It trades sizes a retail account can actually mirror, and because we snapshotted the same wallet ten days earlier, we can show you something no screenshot ever does: how much a 30-day leaderboard number moves while nothing about the trader changes.

Direct answer: the Solana wallet tracked as Orangie's trading address is:

DuQabFqdC9eeBULVa7TTdZYxe8vK8ct5DZr4Xcf7docy

Three things to do with it before you act on it:

• Verify it yourself. Paste the address into an explorer and read the history directly — our guide to reading any Solana wallet on Solscan shows how to check trade history and realized PnL instead of trusting a screenshot. Never take a wallet address from a comment section, a Discord DM, or a "top wallets" list you cannot audit.
• Watch it live. The wallet is tracked in real time on uwuu, with PnL, win rate, holding time, and best/worst trades computed from on-chain transactions rather than self-reported.
• Assume it is not the only one. Active traders split capital across several addresses. One tracked wallet is a verifiable sample of someone's trading, never a complete financial picture — which matters a lot for the "net worth" question further down.

The trader is known in the Solana community by the handle @orangie, whose own X bio describes a memecoin trader and YouTuber. Everything past the handle and the chain — age, identity, lifestyle, totals — is unverified, and this guide treats it that way.

Here is what the chain shows for DuQabFqdC9eeBULVa7TTdZYxe8vK8ct5DZr4Xcf7docy over the trailing 30 days (snapshot: September 18, 2026).

Metric	Value (30 days)
Realized PnL	$6,824
ROI on deployed volume	+12.4%
Win rate	59.4%
Trades	294 (≈10 per day)
Tokens traded	64
Total bought / sold	$55,003 / $53,528
Average holding time	≈3 days
Average PnL per trade	≈$23

Read together, those rows describe a specific kind of operator. At 294 trades and $55,003 of buy volume, the typical position is on the order of $190 — small enough that an account with a few thousand dollars is in the same weight class. A 59.4% win rate means roughly 175 winners and 119 losers, so about two trades in five lose money and the wallet is still up. And the +12.4% ROI is return on the capital that was cycled through those buys, not a return on the trader's total net worth.

One subtlety most trader pages skip: buy volume ($55,003) is slightly higher than sell volume ($53,528), so a small part of the month's capital is still sitting in open positions. Realized PnL counts closed trades only. That cuts both ways — open bags can add to the number later or quietly erase part of it.

This is the part you cannot get from a screenshot. We snapshotted the identical wallet on September 8 and again on September 18. Both are trailing 30-day windows on the same address, same trader, same strategy.

Metric	Sep 8, 2026	Sep 18, 2026
30-day PnL	$9,876	$6,824
Win rate	54.67%	59.4%
Trades	301	294
Average PnL per trade	≈$33	≈$23

In ten days the wallet's headline profit fell about 31% while its win rate went up almost five points. Nothing dramatic happened. A profitable stretch simply aged out of the back of the 30-day window and a flatter stretch replaced it at the front.

Two conclusions follow, and they apply to every wallet on every leaderboard:

• Win rate and profit are not the same signal. The hit rate improved and the money got worse, because outcome size — not outcome frequency — drives PnL. We keep finding this: rayan clears a bigger month at a sub-46% win rate than Cented does at 77.42%.
• A 30-day number is a moving average, not a score. If you pick a trader on Monday because the dashboard said $9,876, you are copying the strategy, not the number. The number will be different by the time your first trade fills.

The practical fix is to judge a wallet across several snapshots and to read style metrics — trade count, holding time, token spread — which drift far more slowly than PnL. Our aggregate research in Solana copy trading statistics covers what separates durable copy targets from one-good-week wallets.

Direct answer: the single best trade in the window, Tako at +$4,444, is about 65% of the wallet's entire 30-day PnL. The worst single trade, an address-labelled token shown as Bgux…, cost −$2,674.

Do the arithmetic on what is left. Strip out the best and the worst trade and the remaining ~292 trades netted roughly $5,054, or about $17 each. That is a genuinely useful shape to see:

• The base is positive. Even without the outlier, the wallet grinds out a profit. Plenty of "top trader" screenshots hide the opposite — one lucky ticket sitting on top of a losing book.
• But the headline is an outlier. Two-thirds of the visible profit came from one name. If you had copied this wallet and your filters happened to block that one token, your month looks nothing like the dashboard's.
• Losses are not small. A −$2,674 trade against ~$190 typical positions means size varies a lot. Conviction plays exist, and they hurt when they miss.

This is the strongest argument for copying with your own risk envelope rather than mirroring blind: caps on per-trade size, slippage limits, and a token blacklist change your distribution of outcomes even when you are copying somebody else's decisions. Our copy trading risk management guide covers the settings that matter, and stop losses in crypto explains where automated exits help and where they get you wicked out.

Direct answer: Orangie is a Solana memecoin trader and content creator who posts as @orangie, with a YouTube presence built around memecoin trading and a large following that predates the crypto content. Searching the bare name is unreliable, because it collides with several unrelated things:

• A clothing brand that owns the exact-match domain and ranks first for the plain keyword.
• A gaming-era handle. The same person's older audience came from gaming content, and Google's related searches still pair the name with Fortnite — which means half the people searching the bare word are not looking for a Solana wallet at all.
• A dictionary entry. "Orangie" is also listed in Wiktionary as offensive Irish slang, and it is a character name in a Canadian TV series. Neither has anything to do with crypto.
• Unrelated apps and tokens. A crypto app with a similar name ranks on page one for "orangie crypto", and any token that borrows a trader's name is almost never affiliated with that trader.

Adding "crypto" to the query fixes most of that noise — which is why orangie crypto is the honest way to search this wallet, and why this page targets that phrase rather than the ambiguous single word. The same collision pattern shows up across the KOL cluster: Cented shares a name with an esports player, and reviewers of Birdeye on Solana keep landing on a reputation-management company with the same brand.

What we deliberately do not publish: a real name, an age, a nationality, or a "net worth". Third-party pages assert all four and contradict each other on every one. On-chain activity is checkable; biography is not.

Direct answer: there is no verifiable net worth figure, and page one of Google proves it. Search that query and you get estimates of roughly $1.2 million from one content farm, "$500 million to $1 billion" from another, a video title advertising a "$10M crypto empire", a social-media estimator quoting weekly earnings ranges, and the trader's own posts joking about billion-dollar totals. Those numbers disagree by three orders of magnitude, which tells you they are guesses.

Here is what can be stated precisely instead: one tracked wallet, DuQabFqdC9eeBULVa7TTdZYxe8vK8ct5DZr4Xcf7docy, realized $6,824 of profit on $55,003 of buy volume in the 30 days to September 18, 2026. That is a per-wallet, per-window, auditable fact. It says nothing about other wallets, exchange balances, off-chain assets, or income from content — and anyone who tells you otherwise is extrapolating.

The useful reframe for a copier: you are not investing in a person's balance sheet, you are subscribing to a strategy's trade flow. Net worth is irrelevant to that. Position size, hit rate, hold time, and drawdown are the variables that determine what copying actually feels like in your account, and all four are on-chain.

Direct answer: the numbers describe a diversified, high-turnover swing trader rather than a same-block sniper — 64 different tokens, about ten trades a day, and an average holding time near three days.

• Broad rotation, not conviction. 64 tokens in a month means the wallet is scanning widely and taking many small shots instead of concentrating on a short watchlist.
• Days, not seconds. A ~3-day average hold is unusual in this crowd. Most tracked memecoin wallets measure holds in minutes, which is why they are nearly impossible to follow manually. This one is closer to swing trading — it gives positions room to work.
• Frequent losses, accepted. At 59.4%, roughly two in five trades lose. The style clearly tolerates being wrong often, because the winners are allowed to get large — the Tako trade is the clearest example.
• Retail-scale sizing. Roughly $190 per position is a size most memecoin pools absorb without visible slippage, which means the fills you see are broadly reproducible rather than being a function of privileged size.

Where does that flow come from? Almost entirely from Solana memecoin venues — fresh pump.fun launches and graduated tokens trading on PumpSwap and Raydium. If you want the mechanics of the market this wallet operates in, our memecoin trading playbook covers entries, exits, and the tooling, and rug checking on Solana covers the contracts to refuse entirely.

Six other traders on this site were snapshotted on September 8, 2026. Putting them side by side makes the point better than any single profile can.

Trader	30-day PnL	Win rate	Trades	≈PnL per trade
rayan	$670,067	45.71%	5,153	≈$130
Cupsey	$447,372	94.25%	2,346	≈$191
Dior	$366,009	53.95%	1,655	≈$221
Cented	$224,081	77.42%	2,428	≈$92
Gake	$184,788	100%	80	≈$2,310
West	$135,299	83.87%	1,145	≈$118
orangie (Sep 18)	$6,824	59.4%	294	≈$23

Orangie is by far the smallest wallet in that table, and the temptation is to read the bottom row as "worst trader". That is the wrong read. Win rates in the table run from 45.71% to 100% with no relationship to profit; what actually separates the rows is size and frequency. Gake cleared $2,310 per trade over 80 trades; rayan cleared $130 per trade over 5,153. Both work. Orangie's row is simply a smaller account doing the same thing at retail scale.

There is a second reason not to over-read rank. On our tracker, the wallets immediately around this one sit within a few hundred dollars of it over the same window — a cluster of profiles between roughly $5,600 and $7,400. At that spacing, "rank" is noise; one average trade reshuffles the order. Leaderboards are a discovery tool, not a scoreboard, which is the same warning we give in our Kolscan review and our roundup of the best KOL trackers on Solana.

Direct answer: get a verified address, then watch it with an explorer or a tracker that computes PnL from transactions. With the address above, the workflow is:

• Live profile. The real-time orangie tracker on uwuu recomputes PnL, ROI, win rate, holding time, and best/worst trades from on-chain data, and the full trader directory does the same for every other wallet in this article.
• Confirm independently. Read the raw history on an explorer so you are not trusting anyone's dashboard, including ours.
• Set alerts. A dedicated Solana wallet tracker will notify you when a watched address buys or sells. Useful for research, still too slow to trade on.
• Study the pattern, not the ticker. Our guide to following smart money on-chain covers how to separate repeatable behaviour from a lucky streak before you allocate anything.

Be careful what you join. "Orangie discord" is one of the most-searched variations of this name, and paid groups, signal channels, and impersonation accounts cluster around any trader with an audience. The on-chain trades are free to watch; nobody needs to sell them to you, and a legitimate copy tool never asks for a seed phrase.

Direct answer: this profile is more copyable than most — a ~3-day average hold and ~$190 positions are far friendlier to a copier than a same-block sniper clearing four-figure tickets. That does not make it easy.

Manual following still fails. Ten trades a day across 64 tokens means alerts arrive while you are asleep, at work, or mid-way through another chart. By the time you read one, open a terminal, set slippage and sign, the entry you saw is gone. The arithmetic of that gap is in is copy trading profitable.

Automated copying closes the gap. A copy trading bot watches the address at the protocol level and fires its own transaction as soon as the target trades — no reaction time in the loop. If the concept is new, start with what crypto copy trading is and the step-by-step how to copy trade on Solana walkthrough, then compare tools in our best Solana trading bot ranking. The definition page on what copy trading actually means is the shortest primer if you only want the mechanics.

The caveats that matter for this particular wallet:

• Your outcome distribution is not theirs. Two-thirds of the visible profit came from one token. Filters that block it — or a smaller cap that shrinks it — change the month materially.
• Losing trades come with the package. A −$2,674 loss is part of this record. Copying means accepting the drawdowns that produced the profit, not just the winners.
• Size relative to your own balance. Mirroring $190 positions from a $300 account concentrates risk; mirroring them from a $5,000 account is a rounding error per trade. Proportional sizing is the whole game, and it is covered in how to copy KOL trades on Solana.
• A wallet with an audience moves differently. When a trader has followers, some of their entries get crowded and some of their exits get sold into. You control this with position caps and slippage limits, not with hope.

Where uwuu fits: you browse a verified on-chain leaderboard, pick a wallet, and mirror its buys and sells in real time with sub-400ms execution — non-custodial, with your own filters and size limits on top, and performance-based fees so the platform earns when you do. Our trader page lists a 0.05 SOL minimum to start, which keeps the entry ticket in the same weight class as the wallet above. For the wider comparison, see Solana trading bot vs manual trading and the best copy trading platforms for crypto.

Direct answer: the chain proves what happened, never why. It shows the buy, the sell, the size, and the timestamp. It does not show intent, information, coordination, or anything about the person.

That distinction matters because famous trading names attract claims in both directions — anonymous accounts celebrating them and anonymous accounts accusing them, usually with no evidence attached to either. We do not repeat unverified claims about anyone, and you should not trade on them. What you can do instead is test copyability with four checks anyone can run on an explorer:

• Entry timing. How many blocks after launch does the wallet buy? Entries that are consistently in the first block or two are hard for anyone to reproduce.
• Trade distribution. Is profit spread across many tokens or concentrated in one or two? You already know the answer here — one name is two-thirds of the month.
• Repeatability. Does the wallet post a similar shape across multiple windows, or did one week make the record? Two snapshots ten days apart is a start; a quarter is better.
• Size sensitivity. Would the same fills exist at your size? For ~$190 positions, usually yes. For six-figure tickets in thin pools, often no.

An edge you cannot reproduce is worth nothing to a copier, no matter how genuine it is for the person who has it. That is the honest test, and it applies to every wallet in the table above.

What is Orangie's wallet address?

The tracked Solana wallet is DuQabFqdC9eeBULVa7TTdZYxe8vK8ct5DZr4Xcf7docy. Verify it on an explorer before acting on it, and assume active traders run more than one address. You can watch it live on uwuu's real-time tracker.

What is Orangie's 30-day PnL and win rate?

Over the 30 days ending September 18, 2026, on-chain data shows $6,824 in realized PnL, a 59.4% win rate across 294 trades, and +12.4% ROI on about $55,000 of buy volume. Ten days earlier the same rolling window read $9,876 at a 54.67% win rate — the figure moves as old days drop out.

What does Orangie trade?

Solana memecoins, judging by the wallet's on-chain history — a mix of fresh pump.fun launches and graduated tokens on venues like PumpSwap and Raydium. The wallet touched 64 different tokens in the last 30 days, with an average holding time near three days.

How rich is Orangie?

There is no public, verifiable net worth figure, and the estimates on page one of Google range from about $1.2 million to "$500 million to $1 billion" — a spread that tells you they are guesses. On-chain, this tracked wallet realized $6,824 over the last 30 days. Other wallets and off-chain holdings are unknowable.

How can I copy Orangie's trades?

Not manually — ten trades a day across 64 tokens arrive faster than you can react. Automatically, yes: a copy trading bot mirrors the wallet's buys and sells into your own wallet in real time, non-custodial, with your own position caps, slippage limits, and token filters applied on top.

Is Orangie a good trader to copy?

The profile is more copyable than most tracked wallets — retail-scale positions and multi-day holds rather than same-block sniping. But two-thirds of the last month's profit came from a single token, so your results depend heavily on sizing and filters. Judge it across several snapshots, not one.

Orangie crypto resolves to one verifiable thing: the wallet DuQabFqdC9eeBULVa7TTdZYxe8vK8ct5DZr4Xcf7docy, which realized $6,824 across 294 trades at a 59.4% win rate in the 30 days to September 18, 2026 — a small, diversified, multi-day-hold profile that happens to be one of the more reproducible ones on our tracker.

Everything else attached to the name — net worth figures, identity claims, rankings — is either unverifiable or moves every day. Read the wallet, not the legend: check it yourself on the live profile, compare it against the verified leaderboard, and if you decide to mirror it, do it with your own risk settings on uwuu.ai.